Our Client Testimonials
Before incorporating Zero Cheating Software into my curriculum, I had growing concerns about the authenticity of my student's papers, many of which bore the unmistakable imprint of ChatGPT assistance. I approached the transition with transparency, explaining to my students the need for and benefits of this innovative tool. The change was immediate and palpable: there was a noticeable evolution in both the style and substance of their submissions, affirming their genuine engagement and learning.
The software itself was a marvel of user-friendliness. It allowed me to seamlessly monitor the drafting process, providing me with clear evidence of my students' active learning and their move away from undue Al reliance.
Installation was very simple, requiring no additional configurations, which is a testament to the software's design for ease of use.
Moreover, when questions arose, I received unparalleled support. The CEO took the time to personally engage with me via Zoom, offering insights and discussing best practices to maximize the software's impact.
This experience has not only enhanced the integrity of academic submissions but has also enriched my teaching practice, ensuring that my students' work is unequivocally their own
Laura Gallagher, Ph.D.
Associate Professor at Kansas Christian College
Before using Zero Cheating, many of my students' papers had high Al scores, and the writing style differed from their previous papers. I was very concerned my students were not learning and frustrated by the lack of certainty and potential false positives.
I met with Neil Parsont, the CEO of Zero Cheating, who personally showed me how his company's unique solution reveals the writing process instead of an Al percentage score. This process made it very clear whether the student legitimately wrote the paper or used Al to generate it. I decided to implement it in my next assignment.
The onboarding materials for both me and my students made it very easy. The students knew exactly what the software did and felt comfortable knowing they would not be falsely accused. The final set of papers all read like they were written by people and not Al. I had no concerns that students were cheating; rather, I viewed the video playbacks and could see they were learning. I highly recommend this software for any educator concerned about student writing.
Nathan Shank, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Composition Director, Writing Center Director at Oklahoma
Christian University.